7 Types of Project Objectives (Plus Examples) | Indeed.com /Fm0 Do )Tj
PDF Monsanto Responses to Plaintiff Request for Admissions >> Such notes and/or memoranda of interviews have not been reviewed by or considered by the potential testifying expert economist. 36 0 obj q (4. q T* T* Q Attendance at such interviews was limited to, at most, the interviewee, Antitrust Division attorneys and staff, counsel for the interviewee (in some interviews), and a potential testifying expert economist (in some interviews). (2)Tj 0 0 m -73.07 -24 Td Inserting this language into the request only hurts you. 65.4 648.61 Td [(ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. 3. [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. Furthermore, Defendant has access to the addresses and/or telephone numbers of those persons listed on Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures and can seek information by addressing formal or informal discovery directly from those entities. Aspose.Pdf for .NET 10.2.0; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT !`xw:*5h
[(Mo)-1.8 (ns)-3.7 (a)-6 (nt)-1.1 (o )]TJ endobj endobj 2030.070 and C.C.P. /TT0 8.03 Tf -103.32 -24 Td << ET C.C.P. /Parent 15 0 R )]TJ Boilerplate objections are becoming more and more common in response to each of the document requests. >> Subject to and notwithstanding this objection, in responding to these discovery requests, Plaintiff will treat the term "third party," as extending to all individuals and entities, not named as parties to this lawsuit, listed on Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures. /Parent 15 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
/TT0 12 Tf << (24)Tj /Type /Page 16 0 obj [(D)2 (i)-2 (vi)-1.1 (si)-4 (on c)3.9 (onc)3.1 (l)-1.9 (ude)3.9 (d t)-1.9 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( t)-2 (he)4.8 ( r)3 (e)3.2 (na)3.9 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2 (ubul)-1.1 (e)3 ( )-9 (a)3.9 (de)3.2 (nom)-2 (a)4 (s)-10.1 ( f)2.9 (ound i)-1.9 (n t)-2.9 (he)4.8 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (d-)3.8 ( a)3.1 (nd hig)7.9 (h-)3 (dos)-11.8 (e)4 ( )-9.1 (g)9.1 (r)3.8 (oup )]TJ /TT0 12 Tf 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm T* See Bihun v. AT&T Info. endobj /TT0 12 Tf [(a)4 (nd )9.9 (S)-3 (up)9.1 (p)10 (l)-2 (e)4 (m)-2 (e)14 (nt)-2 (a)13.9 (l )-2 (R)-4 (e)3.1 (que)4 (st)-4 (s )-2 (f)2 (or)2.9 ( )10.1 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-1.4 (i)-2 (ons )-2 (\()1.9 (J)-11.7 (une)3.9 ( )20.8 (29, 2017\))2.1 (])-6 (. x%0>7P{Reu1D [(c)4 (onduc)4.8 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (d c)3.2 (h)-10 (r)3.8 (oni)-2.7 (c)4.7 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)3 (it)5 (y)20.9 ( )-10.8 (st)-3.1 (udi)-2 (e)3 (s )-1.8 (on)-1.8 ( )-10.9 (g)9.9 (l)-21.9 (y)20.8 (phosa)1.2 (te. ET 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 6.1155 36 Tm (26)Tj stream
umass amherst softball roster. stream
endobj T* /Producer (Aspose.Pdf for .NET 10.2.0; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT) /Outlines 4 0 R 4 regarding "document" or "documents" to the extent that it purports to impose obligations greater than those set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 44.75 0 Td
PDF Discovery Responding to Requests for Production or Inspections (2)Tj stream
(2)Tj << 5. 24 0 obj C)-2.1 (i)-2.1 (v. P)-4.8 (r)3.7 (oc)4.1 (. Code Compliant Demand, Responses and Objections. /Rotate 0 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re EMC /ordmasculine 188 /onequarter /onehalf /threequarters 192 /Agrave /Aacute /Acircumflex /Atilde (25)Tj T* /Contents [88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R] 27 0 obj endobj PLAINTIFF requests that the following Documents and things be identified, produced and made available for inspection and copying at the law firm of Selarz Law Corp., located at 11777 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 702, Los Angeles, California 90049. 67.32 0 Td /Resources 123 0 R (17)Tj 0 -24 TD dog off leash ticket california; Income Tax. 36 -24 Td f Such notes and/or memoranda of interviews have not been reviewed by or considered by the potential testifying expert economist. T* /TT1 12 Tf -29.975 -24 Td Biles v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2004) 124 CA 4th 1315. In its responses, the defendant asserted boilerplate objections. T* /GS0 gs (7)Tj The interviews were memorialized by notes and/or memoranda written by Antitrust Division attorneys and staff. 0 0 612 792 re endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 48.11 0 Td Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o a)4 (l)-2 (so)-2 ( )]TJ /TT0 12 Tf 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.2004 75.2636 Tm T* 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm (7)Tj 36 -24 Td 36 -24 Td << [(i)-1.1 (s )-2 (a)2 ( f)3.1 (or)3.8 (m)-2.8 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 ( a)-6.8 (g)10.7 (e)3.1 (n)-9.9 (c)-16 (y)20.8 ( de)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)-6 (r)-7.9 (m)-1.1 (i)-2 (na)3 (ti)-4 (on of)2 ( EPA. /Filter /FlateDecode /Resources 115 0 R /OCProperties 2 0 R -310.67 -24 Td endobj A Request for Production (also known as a Demand for Inspection) asks the other side to produce and allow copying or inspection and measuring of a document or thing. /Length 149 0 R -339.35 -24 Td
WHY THESE OBJECTIONS ARE GARBAGE | Resolving Discovery Disputes /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -5.594463 -39.599996 cm T* 82.55 0 Td But if you make scant effort to explain why you are right, you might as well not object at all. /Length 155 0 R If the request would take an unreasonable amount of time or money to fulfill in relation to the reasonable needs of the case (proportionality), recite specific, persuasive facts that explain why, preferably in an affidavit. T* T* Rule 33 (Interrogatories to Parties) also requires specificity when making objections. T* American Bar Association q /Author ()
Plaintiff further objects to this interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks information that is readily or more accessible to Defendant from Defendant's own files, including, but not limited to, interrogatory answers that Defendant produced to Plaintiff, transcripts of depositions of current or former directors, officers, and employees of Defendant, documents that Defendant produced to Plaintiff, and correspondence and other communications from Defendant to Plaintiff. )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ x+ |
47.76 0 Td [(t)-1.1 (ha)3.1 (t)-2 ( Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o ha)4 (s )-2 (no)-2 (t)-3 ( c)3.9 (onduc)4.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d t)-1.9 (ox)-10.9 (i)-1.1 (c)3 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)30 ( st)-3.9 (udi)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-12 (of)3.8 ( sh)-1.8 (or)1.1 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (r)2.1 ( dur)-6 (a)3 (ti)-4 (ons,)-2 ( g)-2 (e)2.9 (n)-10.8 (ot)-2 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)4.8 (i)-2.8 (t)-12 (y)30.8 ( st)-4.6 (udi)-2.1 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (, a)4.7 (nd )]TJ /TT0 11.03 Tf [(e)4.8 (t)-11.9 ( seq. 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm DISCOVERY GAMES AND MISCONCEPTIONS Is the Court Correct That There is No Motion to Strike in Discovery? )2 (14)2 ( in)8.2 ( P)-3 (l)-2 (a)13.9 (i)7.1 (nt)8.9 (i)-1.9 (f)2 (f)3 (s)9.9 (\222)2.2 ( A)2 (m)-1.9 (e)13.8 (nde)14 (d)10.9 ( )]TJ 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 6.1155 36 Tm Q P)-4.7 (ur)3.7 (su)-1.8 (a)3 (nt)-1.9 ( t)-2 (o )-10 (t)-2 (he)3.1 ( C)-2.1 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (i)-1.2 (f)2.1 (or)2.9 (ni)-1.8 (a)3.9 ( C)-3 (ode)4.8 ( )]TJ T* 6 regarding "statement" to the extent it relies on the undefined term "CID investigation" and the defined term "third party." _yD{GT&b. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm (24)Tj (9)Tj 482.85 624.61 Td T* 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 527.1214635 755.2367083 cm /Type /Page Prevent flooding in the community by building gabions and digging trenches by the last phase of the project. << (17)Tj ( )Tj [(c)4 (onduc)4.8 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (d b)-20.8 (y)20.8 ( )-10.8 (B)7.8 (i)-2.8 (o/)-2 (d)-9.1 (y)19.9 (n)-10.8 (a)4.8 (m)-2.8 (i)-2 (c)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( doe)4.8 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 (t)-2.9 ( r)2.9 (e)3.1 (por)3 (t)-1.8 ( a)4.7 ( ki)-2.7 (dn)-9.2 (e)-6.8 (y)20.7 ( t)-1.9 (um)-2.8 (or)3.7 ( )-9.9 (f)2.1 (or)3 ( c)4.8 (ont)-1.9 (r)2.9 (ol)-1.9 ( )-10 (a)3.1 (ni)-1.9 (m)-1.2 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 ( N)1.9 (o. T* [(D)1.1 (E)-2 (N)1.8 (IE)-4.8 (S)-4.8 ( )]TJ ^ci|kFC5iCPTZGhG9#cvwz&>2/DxHI4l
zl}RtvNM,rru-mIi1n.~,aX2l:Kz pKbQ}"nDo,4noiI[6Qv,m, ,%}?T\8
Y
Xem)f,]jmGnVYye^|lY5j2)_`gG<7fGyjW$6]k@ MB-Mm~S-O$
pUxqHCxPiJSN 65 0 obj [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm 2.
Q 13009 issued to Dentsply by the DOJ in connection with its antitrust investigation of Dentsply prior to the filing of its complaint on January 5, 1999," that definition gives no greater meaning to the phrase "CID investigation," unless it is intended to limit the definition of "statement" to any comment, observation, remark, observation, or affirmation, whether in written or oral form, made by a third party to Plaintiff during the Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009 investigation. 42 0 obj Should any such disclosure by Plaintiff occur, it is inadvertent and shall not constitute a waiver of any privilege. T* [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( )-49.1 (t)-2.9 (ha)4.8 (t)-1.9 ( )-40 (Mo)-2 (ns)-3.1 (a)4 (nt)-1.9 (o )-50.9 (c)3.9 (o)10 (nduc)14 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d)10 ( )-49.9 (no )-49.1 (a)13.9 (ni)7.1 (m)-1.9 (a)13.9 (l)-1.9 ( )-49.1 (c)3.9 (hr)2.1 (o)10.9 (n)10 (i)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( )-40 (t)-1.9 (o)9 (x)-9 (i)-2 (c)3.9 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29.1 ( )-19 (s)-1.9 (t)-2 (ud)9.9 (ies )-49.9 (on)9 ( )]TJ